Can Money Ever Really Be Removed from Politics?

One possible solution to minimize the influence of money in politics is to eliminate ban campaigns and compel candidates to provide biographies, their plans for office, and their voting records if they have held office. Independent groups should fact-check all materials to ensure transparency and accuracy.

Despite this, wealthy individuals would still likely contribute money and gifts to politicians. However, if strict laws and severe punishments were established, the influence of such contributions could be curtailed significantly.

There are alternative ways to approach getting money out of politics, such as engaging in business, channeling your talent into skills, and making informed choices as voters. These methods can help reduce the financial influence in political processes, making elections more equitable.

The following process has been observed:

Become Prime Minister (PM) Resign from the PM position Join the speaker circuit and potentially charge exorbitant fees for motivational speeches.

It should be noted that there is no correlation between a PM's achievements and their ability to generate vast sums of money post-political career. This highlights the complexity and potential disconnect between political performance and financial success in such roles.

From personal experience in running for office, the cost of making one's electorate aware of one's candidacy and providing insights is significant. In a hypothetical world without money in politics, only well-known individuals could be elected. However, in reality, large expenditures are necessary for statewide or national office.

The blame for this situation can be placed on the electorate. If voters ignored campaign advertisements, mailings, and other promotional materials and instead attended candidate events or researched others' platforms, money would have less influence. While this may not completely eliminate the impact of money, it would significantly diminish its role as a decisive factor.

Another solution is to ensure the electorate is well-informed. When the populace is well-informed, money will engage inversely with political influence. If the public understands and scrutinizes the impacts of political contributions, the effectiveness of such contributions diminishes. Thus, increasing voter awareness and engagement in the political process is critical.

In areas where the government exerts less control over daily life and business, money may exert less influence over politics. Favorable treatment by the government towards specific entities is often crucial for survival. Therefore, a laissez-faire approach to governance can reduce the need for political donations and the corruption that accompanies them.