Is Machu Picchus True Name Huayna Picchu?

Is Machu Picchu's True Name Huayna Picchu?

The citadel of Machu Picchu is one of the most famous and awe-inspiring archaeological sites in the Americas. As fascinating as the site is, many of us, including early explorers, might be surprised to learn that the name we frequently use might not be the original one. This article will delve into whether Machu Picchu is the true name of the Andean citadel, or if it might have had a different name.

The Known Names

Many people know Machu Picchu as the site that sits atop a mountain in the Andes, on the saddle between two peaks. These peaks, known as Machu Picchu and Huayna Picchu, roughly translate to "old peak" and "new peak," respectively. Confusingly, however, the name "Machu Picchu" is the one that has become more widely recognized and used among tourists and visitors.

The Earliest Use of the Name

The name "Machu Picchu" gained prominence when western explorers first visited the site in the early 20th century. They heard both names from local guides and eventually adopted "Machu Picchu" as the official name. However, historical records and local knowledge indicate that this might not have always been the case.

Local Knowledge and Old Records

Historical documents and accounts from the late 1500s suggest that locals and Native Americans, those who knew the region intimately, were using the name "Huayna Picchu" long before the arrival of western explorers. Some scholars and historians believe that this could be the true name of the citadel, with "Machu Picchu" being a more recent nomenclature adopted by the outside world.

The Possible Original Name

There is a possibility that the site might have had an entirely different name before the 1500s when it was used as a royal residence. The Inca's sophisticated and intricate naming conventions were likely based on the geographic features and cultural significance of the area. The name "Huayna Picchu" is still used by locals and has a strong connection to the region's indigenous heritage, making it a plausible candidate for the true name of the citadel.

Conclusion

Whether Machu Picchu was always known by this name or if it has a more intriguing backstory as "Huayna Picchu" remains a matter of speculation. The truth could lie in the rich tapestry of local and historical knowledge, or in the detailed records of the Indigenous peoples who first called this place home.

For the many visitors who stand in awe of this ancient site, the name may hold no more than vague mystery. However, for those interested in the history and cultural significance of Machu Picchu, the possibility that its true name might be Huayna Picchu adds an intriguing layer to our understanding of this iconic archaeological site.